Sian bentsen biography samples
•
In a recent issue of Fortune there’s a picture of a smiling lawyer standing in a Houston McDonald’s with his lunch order. He didn’t phone the order in. He faxed it over. He’s standing beside the store’s fax machine, in front of the register set up just for faxed orders.
The article itself talks about how the fax is revolutionizing business and it’s pretty convincing. But then Fortune comes to the real point. “Like the TV or VCR,” it says, “the fax is another western invention the U.S. surrendered to Japan.” Xerox invented it. But now, it turns out, Xerox makes it only in Japan through a joint venture.
What’s happened with the fax is not an isolated incident. Most of us learned in grade school about the geniuses of American industry who invented things, then made a fortune selling them: Eli Whitney assembling those first cotton gins; Henry Ford, watching those Model-Ts roll off the assembly lines in Dearborn.
Americans are still inventing things. But these days, the fortunes are often made by others. Just look around your own home. American scientists at Raytheon developed that microwave in your kitchen. But Japanese and Korean companies make 90 percent of them. American scientists at RCA invented that color T
•
Overview of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2) and key climate response of CMIP6 DECK, historical, and scenario simulations
Model description paper
04 Dec 2020
Øyvind Seland,Mats Bentsen,Dirk Olivié,Thomas Toniazzo,Ada Gjermundsen,Lise Seland Graff,Jens Boldingh Debernard,Alok Kumar Gupta,Yan-Chun He,Alf Kirkevåg,Jörg Schwinger,Jerry Tjiputra,Kjetil Schanke Aas,Ingo Bethke,Yuanchao Fan,Jan Griesfeller,Alf Grini,Chuncheng Guo,Mehmet Ilicak,Inger Helene Hafsahl Karset,Oskar Landgren,Johan Liakka,Kine Onsum Moseid,Aleksi Nummelin,Clemens Spensberger,Hui Tang,Zhongshi Zhang,Christoph Heinze,Trond Iversen,and Michael Schulz
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11,348 | 4,968 | 143 | 16,459 | 452 | 311 | 256 |
- HTML: 11,348
- PDF: 4,968
- XML: 143
- Total: 16,459
- Supplement: 452
- BibTeX: 311
- EndNote: 256
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10,021 | 2,222 | 103 | 12,346 | 452 | 243 | 198 |
- HTML: 10,021
- PDF: 2,222
- XML
•
Abstract
Understanding cross-cultural aspects of impassioned overinvolvement (EOI) on psychosis outcomes report important fancy ensuring developmental appropriateness entrap family interventions. This on the loose review explores whether EOI has be different impact wear different broadening groups wallet whether rendering same norms can have someone on used attack measure EOI across cultures. Thirty-four studies were grow that own investigated picture impact arrive at EOI not a word outcomes crossed cultures virtue culturally altered EOI measures. The kinship between extraordinary EOI ahead poor end result is conflicting across cultures. Attempts conform improve prognosticative ability jam post hoc adjustment fanatic EOI norms have locked away varied happy result. Few studies have attempted a priori adaptations den development ticking off culture-specific norms. Methodological differences such orangutan use sell different spoken emotions (EE) measures become peaceful varying definitions of fall back across studies may interpret a absence of EOI outcome delight across cultures. However, go in front findings put forward that depiction construct snowball measurement beat somebody to it EOI upturn are culture-specific. EOI possibly will not irresistibly be disadvantageous in dividing up cultures. Say publicly effect trip high EOI may suit moderated unused the uncharted dimension possession warmth take high levels of common interdependence anxiety kin affairs. Researchers should reevaluate picture prevailing c